<
>

Show Blog

I brought a $500 quad core computer today.

Posted by jakoblin Wednesday March 12 2008 at 4:15AM
Login or Register to rate this blog post!

the pc wa on sale.

User Comments

  • Dwarfman420- Wed Mar 12 2008 4:26AM
    • First in this soon to be truly Legendary Blog.

       

  • Koddo- Wed Mar 12 2008 8:48AM
    • This has been the best blog i've ever seen. Just awesome. Though I believe you are bullshitting.

  • Thaliost- Wed Mar 12 2008 10:19AM
    • I bow down to your awsome blogging skills!

  • millux- Wed Mar 12 2008 10:28AM
    • Follow this link to my blog where I didn't buy a computer today:

       

  • brian72282- Wed Mar 12 2008 1:51PM
    • http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/system/Athlon64_AM2_Dual_Core_Custom_Build_Configurator/#configurator_top

       

      He speaks the truth.

  • Kordesh- Wed Mar 12 2008 2:54PM
    • i lik sale

  • tkreep- Wed Mar 12 2008 3:28PM
    • thats a pretty sweet deal in that website.

  • csthao- Wed Mar 12 2008 4:30PM
    • obviously you guys dont know how to shop...i paid bout 600 bucks for my quad core. custom built. 2gigs of ram 160gig hard drive 250gig external harddrive nvidia geforce 8600 gtx 600 watt power supply...

  • Drewg- Wed Mar 12 2008 4:41PM
    • ur an idiot if u buy a quad core computer for gaming.

      quad cores are meant to be for servers and engineering software and things along the lines of serious multitasking.

  • Vortigon- Wed Mar 12 2008 5:04PM
    • Drewg you obviously know NOTHING about a modern CPU or software.

      Many games are designed to work with multi-core CPUs and can utilise all of the cores at the same time.

      Only an idiot can't see the benefit of using quad core systems for gaming.

      Get with the times before your left behind.

  • Unicorns_Pwn- Wed Mar 12 2008 6:23PM
    • Vortigon, please make this expansive list of games ready to take advantage of SMP at this time... cause your list will  be neither that long or impressive. For some of those games that even are SMP you will most likely find  a bottleneck elsewhere in the system which will make the extra core a moot point. There is a reason why they are dumping some quadcore processors at prices below dualcores you know.

       

      Only an idiot buys into the belief that quad core is  a benefit to gaming right now. Down the road may be one thing but the quad offerings of today will be long outdated.

  • Duvious- Wed Mar 12 2008 6:27PM
    • actually your both somewhat right more cores more often than not are ONLY utilized as Drewg said by typically higher end enterprise applications. 

       

      vort- the majority of the software on the market including games DOES NOT support a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th core, so I would actually tell you to get with the times or better understand the technology before you blast someone.

      a high end video card and a good amount of ram will be much better than having that extra core or two on your system

      granted if you can have both that much better, but you WILL NOT see the "majority" of software and games supporting more than one core for at least another 6-18 months.  KEY WORD MAJORITY, my god you people are so quick to judge its ridiculous.

  • Unicorns_Pwn- Wed Mar 12 2008 6:32PM
    • Basically you just repeated what i stated.. thanks for agreeing yet somehow finding me only  "somewhat right"

  • Unicorns_Pwn- Wed Mar 12 2008 6:35PM
    • err wait maybe that one wasnt for me.. damn the no edit button..

      sorry Duvious

  • Moreander- Thu Mar 13 2008 3:16AM
    • Can still play most games on my semi-budget 5 year old system (which I bought and built 5 years ago), only thing I changed in those 5 years is add some hard-drive space (from 150Gigs to 950Gigs), and add a little extra RAM, and I think my Graphics card is only 4 years old, budget 9600 series radeon. The one area my machine is showing it's age is in the newest FPS games (last half year or so), other then that don't have much of a problem.

Special Offers