Age of Conan

Originally posted by Immercenary

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

 

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

vanguard was made by soe.....and they cant fix a thing......EQ2.....4 years old and the game still runs like crap....swg.....they killed......planet side...they killed........MO.....they killed........BOTBS.......flopped....

 

funcome will fix this game.....they are a great company,,,,,dont go compareing it to some sh***y company....

 

remember WoW.....that had a crappy beta and release.....look at it now...

 

 

 

The only difference between AoC and Vanguard is that AoC has loading screens.  Everything else is and will be the same outcome.  This game is pitiful.

how? the game is in beta.....

 

 

you cant judge a game in beta

 

Dude it goes live in 8 days.  From the looks of it, they have 2 years of development left.  I don't think they will make it.  It may keep enough peeps to keep it running like Vanguard.  They will have 1-2 servers by the end of the year.

The game is a major failure.  Maybe not as big a failure as Vanguard be it is very close.

the open beta is an old client...the closed beta is mush better

 

you are joking right ?

 

i know a man who knows a dog that has the closed beta client installed right now and played tonight!

it still runs like a dog FACT!

 

shame coz games fairly solid,just perfomeance and bugs are killing it!

 

and as for the OP

 

yes we have to compare it to VsoH in fact i played that at beta and release and trust me bro,even that mess ran better than this does "from what the dog told me"!

 

also soe didnt kill Vsoh or MxO thay were damaged goods way before soe got their hands on em!

and eq2 have you even played it ?

 

its the one thing they have done right!

 

next time you wanna post shi*e get yer facts right first!

and you refer to me twice....look who your talking to

Yes..........................................this.................. will................................... not ...........................happen............................ to................................................ funcome

LEARN TO TYPE!

Originally posted by Celestian

 

Bzzzt, wrong. Try Sigil.

Try again!

 

Bzzzztttt, Sigil had loans from Microsoft..........Every MMO runs into delays and cost over-runs........Microsoft, like every other MMO it has invested in, pulled out and called in its loans............SOE smiles as they bail out Sigil's loans..............Then proceeds to take sigil over and let most everyone go...............SOE did not want Vanguard to compete with EQ2.............But SOE could not pass up taking a game over at bottom dollar..................SOE HAS HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO FIX VANGUARD!!

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

 

Originally posted by Immercenary

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

 

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

vanguard was made by soe.....and they cant fix a thing......EQ2.....4 years old and the game still runs like crap....swg.....they killed......planet side...they killed........MO.....they killed........BOTBS.......flopped....

 

funcome will fix this game.....they are a great company,,,,,dont go compareing it to some sh***y company....

 

remember WoW.....that had a crappy beta and release.....look at it now...

 

 

 

The only difference between AoC and Vanguard is that AoC has loading screens.  Everything else is and will be the same outcome.  This game is pitiful.

how? the game is in beta.....

 

 

you cant judge a game in beta

 

Dude it goes live in 8 days.  From the looks of it, they have 2 years of development left.  I don't think they will make it.  It may keep enough peeps to keep it running like Vanguard.  They will have 1-2 servers by the end of the year.

The game is a major failure.  Maybe not as big a failure as Vanguard be it is very close.

the open beta is an old client...the closed beta is mush better

 

you are joking right ?

 

i know a man who knows a dog that has the closed beta client installed right now and played tonight!

it still runs like a dog FACT!

 

shame coz games fairly solid,just perfomeance and bugs are killing it!

 

and as for the OP

 

yes we have to compare it to VsoH in fact i played that at beta and release and trust me bro,even that mess ran better than this does "from what the dog told me"!

 

also soe didnt kill Vsoh or MxO thay were damaged goods way before soe got their hands on em!

and eq2 have you even played it ?

 

its the one thing they have done right!

 

next time you wanna post shi*e get yer facts right first!

TROLL

 

 

and you refer to me twice....look who your talking to

my bad i guess!

but TROLL roflmao what for stating FACT

no my fellow poster,a troller wouldve slated the game from top to bottom and wouldnt have cared for anything good said about the game!

if you actually took the time to read nice and slowly maybe you would have realised,i both praised and knocked it in equal amounts!

and trolling your OP what for being incorrect on mulitple levels,no no no

good lord boy i am no troll,but good luck with the real ones who will post in this thread!

Originally posted by DragonOak

 

Originally posted by Celestian

 

Bzzzt, wrong. Try Sigil.

Try again!

 

 

Bzzzztttt, Sigil had loans from Microsoft..........Every MMO runs into delays and cost over-runs........Microsoft, like every other MMO it has invested in, pulled out and called in its loans............SOE smiles as they bail out Sigil's loans..............Then proceeds to take sigil over and let most everyone go...............SOE did not want Vanguard to compete with EQ2.............But SOE could not pass up taking a game over at bottom dollar..................SOE HAS HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO FIX VANGUARD!!

sigil were allways the devs,it was allways there game!

microsoft were gonna publish and backed the game

soe were only gonna publish

then went in like vultures when sigil went tits up!

but agreed soe ahouldve fixed it alot more by now,but it was uber broken i suppose :)

Originally posted by Immercenary

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

 

Originally posted by Immercenary

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

 

Originally posted by Tnice

 

Originally posted by TheGreyMan

vanguard was made by soe.....and they cant fix a thing......EQ2.....4 years old and the game still runs like crap....swg.....they killed......planet side...they killed........MO.....they killed........BOTBS.......flopped....

 

funcome will fix this game.....they are a great company,,,,,dont go compareing it to some sh***y company....

 

remember WoW.....that had a crappy beta and release.....look at it now...

 

 

 

The only difference between AoC and Vanguard is that AoC has loading screens.  Everything else is and will be the same outcome.  This game is pitiful.

how? the game is in beta.....

 

 

you cant judge a game in beta

 

Dude it goes live in 8 days.  From the looks of it, they have 2 years of development left.  I don't think they will make it.  It may keep enough peeps to keep it running like Vanguard.  They will have 1-2 servers by the end of the year.

The game is a major failure.  Maybe not as big a failure as Vanguard be it is very close.

the open beta is an old client...the closed beta is mush better

 

you are joking right ?

 

i know a man who knows a dog that has the closed beta client installed right now and played tonight!

it still runs like a dog FACT!

 

shame coz games fairly solid,just perfomeance and bugs are killing it!

 

and as for the OP

 

yes we have to compare it to VsoH in fact i played that at beta and release and trust me bro,even that mess ran better than this does "from what the dog told me"!

 

also soe didnt kill Vsoh or MxO thay were damaged goods way before soe got their hands on em!

and eq2 have you even played it ?

 

its the one thing they have done right!

 

next time you wanna post shi*e get yer facts right first!

TROLL

 

 

and you refer to me twice....look who your talking to

Meh!

 

 

my bad i guess!

 

but TROLL roflmao what for stating FACT

 

no my fellow poster,a troller wouldve slated the game from top to bottom and wouldnt have cared for anything good said about the game!

 

if you actually took the time to read nice and slowly maybe you would have realised,i both praised and knocked it in equal amounts!

 

and trolling your OP what for being incorrect on mulitple levels,no no no

 

good lord boy i am no troll,but good luck with the real ones who will post in this thread!

The word FACT doesnt mean shit in these forums.  There are other people who say that they have played in CB and performance is great.  So what makes you so special that anyone should believe you especialy since you said its your friend who played not you?

I thought the dog played.

Originally posted by Immercenary

 

Originally posted by DragonOak

 

Originally posted by Celestian

 

Bzzzt, wrong. Try Sigil.

Try again!

 

 

Bzzzztttt, Sigil had loans from Microsoft..........Every MMO runs into delays and cost over-runs........Microsoft, like every other MMO it has invested in, pulled out and called in its loans............SOE smiles as they bail out Sigil's loans..............Then proceeds to take sigil over and let most everyone go...............SOE did not want Vanguard to compete with EQ2.............But SOE could not pass up taking a game over at bottom dollar..................SOE HAS HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO FIX VANGUARD!!

but we are talking about launch,not present

 

 

sigil were allways the devs,it was allways there game!

 

microsoft were gonna publish and backed the game

 

soe were only gonna publish

 

then went in like vultures when sigil went tits up!

 

but agreed soe ahouldve fixed it alot more by now,but it was uber broken i suppose :)

Microsoft pulled out before launch, SOE took over before launch.

If you don't believe that SOE is capable of sitting up a company like sigil to fail in order to be able to take the company over at bottom dollar, then you are terribly naive.