Age of Conan

Originally posted by Alan0n

 

Originally posted by matrixvs

 

Originally posted by Alan0n

Gonna throw out few facts about few things.

AOC will be launching with problems for alot of players performance wise.  I find it quite ironic that after a post from me got deleted cause it showed the game crashing I got a following msg from Mod on this website

You prolly didnt get to read my post but you have WAY to many programs running in your background. I saw in your SS that you have 50 Active Processes running. OUCH! Not sure about Vista but XP only needs 14 to run. Turn off all the useless stuff you have running and it will make a BIG difference. You can always turn them back on after you finish playing AoC. Hope that helps.

1.  Im running windows vista installed 2 days ago when the screenshot was taken.  There is only one none orginal Windows vista program not running.  That is my anti-virus that I have turned of and it doesn't matter at all. 

2.  I have turned of every single windows Vista coponent that can without  the system crashing. 

3. Windows VIsta works diffrently than XP in the sence that the task manager shows all running tasks while XP does only show the users runnig tasks.   So if a person is having 14 tasks shown in their taskbar in XP doesn't mean there arnt more running.  I have 12 processes running as user. 

4.  My pc spec.  Some are claiming my PC is crap and thats why its not working.  I have already posted my spec few times including few days ago - I do so here again.

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/1874/runitbf7.jpg

5.  It doesn't matter if I run the game in highest quality or the lowest.  I have the same problems.  OFC the FPS is higher but the stuttering and crashes are exactly the same.

6.  My PC can run every single game other than AOC exept one - Hellgate London.  Its kinda strange Im not crashing for the other games since my PC is to blame ?  Isn't it ?   Now Hellgate London ... do I need to talk about that sad story of a game ?  Maybe I need to remind you what memory leak did to that game ?   Yes lets do that and maybe someone will see some simularities ?  

 ever thought in the right mind that the real problem is windows vista...?

 

most of u ppl dont seem to remember that microcrap even confirmed that vista actuly works crap doesnt support a lot and has more bug and flaws than win 95 had..

 

so stop blaming the damn game for ur own stupidity

Vista is part of the problem.  Thats for sure.  But there are some players that are running XP and still have these memory crashes.   Part of the problem is that Vista is using up RAM for the video card and when it comes to high memory demanding games like AOC it will clash.  Now that doesn't mean its just Vista to blame.  No game to this date has been released with more than 2 gb of RAM as requered to play.   Or using windows VIsta 64 bit version. 

 

But... if Vista is the problem and considering microsoft gaming is behind AOC then why not fix it ?  Thing is - it wont get solved while noone confirms there is an issue.  At this point in time Funcom talk about minority of ppl having problems.  Minority could still be 49%. 

LOTRO- Vista crash

WoW + Vista = issues

EQ2 and Vista memory issues

But Vista is not the issue...AoC is...

Yeppers!

Originally posted by Deathstrike2

 

Originally posted by Alan0n

 

 

 The truth will be out in few days and we will exactly see what ppl like you are all about. 

 

Exactly.  The truth will be out in a few days, so why waste time arguing about whether or not a game is good on forums?   Let's all just put our crystal balls down and wait and see.

 

 

NO! Don't stop. This is funny as hell. I've probably seen troll and fanboi thrown around in the first 3 pages of this thread than in half the other threads combined, lol. Just because it's Alan0n, eh? And before you go saying he's a WAR fan, he was bashing that game earlier this year. So either he doesn't like either game, he's an equal troll, or he just wants to have fun. And all you fanbois are doing is helping him.

EDIT: As for saying whether these are facts or not, 79.812% of all Internet facts are either A) Completely false or B) Contain less than 50% truth. Funny, huh? Think about what I just said. It's contradictory.

Originally posted by spector75

Originally posted by Alan0n

 

Originally posted by Vayle

 

Originally posted by Alan0n

 

Originally posted by 3on1

OP, plz dont ignore the proofpost of that AoC blog and post your response to it. id love to hear your comments on it. i wont believe u till u post something that confirms your "facts"

Im not allowed to post any proofs cause that would be breaking NDA.  All I can ask ppl to do is to not jump of on the Pre-Order wagon until you are 110% sure the game is running for you.  The rest will come out as soon as game launches in Pre-order wich is just few days away.   You wont miss alot not pre-ordering.  What I, you and we  all should do is to wait until the game is ready - then we pay for it and enjoy it.  Its not part of the job subscription as a custimor to sit and hope a company comes up with a fix  - weeks or months after you have bought it.    We get one free month playing when buying the game.  That game should offer trouble free gameplay.  Im just pointing out at this point there is a chance custimors wont.  And there is nothing wrong with that.

 

If the game is gonna run great and will be a hit - then the custimors or Funcom havn't lost anything if ppl do the vize thing and wait.  What is worrying is that Funcom is putting more and more extra features to the game for those that pre-order.  Why?   Its just a fair question to ask.

Al you are so full of it it's not even funny.

 

First you "claim' to be in the closed beta then try to spread panic because "you say" the game won't run on your computer.  Now you change your tune and try to convince "other" customers that they should "wait" to buy the game.

It's a nice try but I think 90% of the people here can see that you have an agenda.

I have posted proofs that the game isn't running for me.  Those are deleted cause of breach of NDA.  As for my agenda other than asking ppl to not Pre-order something that they are not sure will be working - And that we as paying custimors should be asking for working product at launch.  Then I hope you see it as well as others.  If you think my agenda is anything diffrent then your welcome to think so.

 

I will be the first to tell you if my issues with the game dissapear and Im pretty sure that Pre-orders will tell you if spellweaving is in at launch and they will probaly tell us what they think of it. 

What Im asking ppl to do is not spend even 2 cents on product that is not ready or in any way broken- then it doesn't matter if its AOC - WAR - WOW - AC or Super mario.  If you dissagree with me on that one then ok.  But then maybe you will think back at some point cause its us that are allowing the developers to throw things out that are not ready.   It wont change unless we do something about it. 

Name me one game in the history of gaming that has been 100% flawless

Tetris.

Originally posted by Amegashie

Interesting approach to the concept pf "facts".

Now shush, back under your bridge.

LOL made me laugh. Needed one today.

I haven't taken the time to read all these posts here, just noticed this thread now...

...I hope somebody corrected the OP... he knows that it was announced that spellweaving, DX10, and siege battles would be released at launch, at least at this point, right?

Originally posted by Douhk

I haven't taken the time to read all these posts here, just noticed this thread now...

...I hope somebody corrected the OP... he knows that it was announced that spellweaving, DX10, and siege battles would be released at launch, at least at this point, right?

OP only comment is, he is in CB and NDA doesnt allow him to answer back on the subject.

FunCom has said it will be in on the retail client. So he may very well be actually telling the truth, that those features arent in the CB. I know certainly that spellweaving is supposed to be put in on retail only, from what i could gather of all quotes from devs here and there. CBA to find and give links to trolls, fandbois and haters. Ill just wait for release and see if my preorder was worth it. (1-13 and PvP gameplay so far hasnt made me take the pre order back atleast)

Originally posted by Kcissem

 

Originally posted by openedge1

The processor is running at default (E6600 at 2.4) this is a minimum as stated by Funcom, and not "recommended"...3.0Ghz is recommended...and don't throw the "dual core" argument...it is still 2.4 a core, and I dont care who you are...this is a low rating...period. I use an E6600 oc'd to 3Ghz with ZERO issues...(besides 2 other systems all 3 Ghz...and all ran perfectly fine)

why not use the dual core arguement?  the minimum specs that state 3.0ghz is for 1 cpu.  have 2 cpus running at 2.4 is well above minimum specs.   forinstance i have 4 cpus running at 2.67ghz and when i run the "can i run it" program on nvidia's site for AOC it states it is above recommended specs not below.

 

 

Having more than one core means quite alot especially if the program is programmed for multithreading which AOC is,  so while he may have a cpu clocked at 2.4 he has two of them so AOC it self will utilize his second core for different threads, effectively you have 2 cpu's daisy chained sharing the load. The same goes for quad cores and yes AOC does take advantage of all 4 cores as they were all used for me during OB.

lowest  RECOMMENDED is intel core 2 due 2.4 MINIMUM IS: intel pentium 4 3ghz or equivalent

Is crafting the way to get rich or can you get all your stuff for npc?