| Thread (27 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
sandgrown 5/28/08 5:48:32 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 5/07/08 |
i ve had a look through some of the early reviews online , it makes some interesting reading . most are pretty favourable i must say but nearly all of them say to be certain that you pc its close to the recomended specs ( not the required specs ) if you dont want a frustrating time of it . some go so far as to say this is a fatal flaw in the games design . http://www.theburialgrounds.com/Articles/Article8.shtml if funcom has overestimated the power of the average home system .i wonder how many of those 400 thousand player will be there in a months time . i m already hearing rumours that possibly as many as a half of them could cancel thier subs . my recomendation to anyone who does nt have a system thats somewhere near the recomended specs is to wait for a free trial , see how it runs on your pc first . if aoc runs on the average system like some posts say then funcom really should put one out asap . put peoples minds to rest . ( even if its a three day trial ) theres a lot of potential customers out there holding off buying because they dont want to waste thier money . |
|
| |
||
|
Kyleran 5/28/08 5:52:19 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
It is all vaporware until I see it go live! |
No doubt many folks will have trouble running the game, and some number of people will cancel their subs, happens in every game. What might happen is some folks might go out and upgrade their hardware which will slowly increase the number of subs in the coming months. (its what I did)
|
|
| "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon EVE Cult member since May 2007 Regarding EVE: "To be honest, I think God himself created this game." - Shek "When in doubt, add ninjas" - Murais
|
||
|
Xasapis 5/28/08 5:52:33 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 1/12/07 |
Better for the gamers if the game overshoots the requirements and thus remains relevant for years to come than undershoots and is obsolete from day 1. Worse for the company of course, since the subscription numbers will be lower. So? |
|
| |
||
|
Riho06 5/28/08 5:54:00 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 8/25/06 |
The fatal flaw in that review is system requirements. MOST people who play games have no idea how to setup their computer to maximize their performance in these games. This is the computer age, FUNCOM shouldn't be penalized for people's ignorance of computers or the fact their trying to play the game with something as powerful as my Ipod.
This is not Vanguard, it doesn't take a supercomputer to run it. People who claim that are ignorant of their computer systems or just inaccurate in that comment. |
|
| |
||
|
thark 5/28/08 6:04:08 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 1/01/03 |
This is an old beta review... Was even quoted by the one doing the review on this forum a while back.. Ohh well.. |
|
| |
||
|
kedoremos 5/28/08 6:07:04 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/12/05
"What the fuck is a robster craw?" |
Originally posted by Riho06 Yes they most certainly should. I'm not a fanboy of any game however Vanguard runs better on my rig than AoC. |
|
|
Bartzilla 5/28/08 6:14:15 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 1/13/08 |
Originally posted by Riho06You are right in that respect. It is the computer age. But even then, there are a lot of non-power users who play games or are interested in playing something like AoC but don't have the knowledge to understand techspeak. While Funcom shouldn't be penalized they will be. After all, isn't it their business to make money? If only a small percentage play AoC because of system requirements they are defeating the purpose of their existence. I would think that lower system requirements would mean more of a user base.. |
|
| |
||
|
Wakygreek 5/28/08 6:18:06 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 4/30/08
Patience is a virtue, reason a necessity |
Originally posted by kedoremos
|
|
|
|
||
|
Xasapis 5/28/08 6:24:09 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 1/12/07 |
If the gamers don't have a good experience with AoC, due to technical issues, then they will unsubscribe. When that happens, any company will lose. I guess it's in the nature of the beast, called PC gaming. |
|
| |
||
|
freekstyle 5/28/08 6:39:07 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 12/16/07 |
I like how the people who are playing it are like, "yea if the user cant run it its not funcoms fault it is just their fault for not knowing how to work their computers lol."
I'm pretty sure most gamers are going to know how to work a PC whoever said, "Even if Funcom loses subs because it needs a major computer to run... So?"
Well, you won't be saying So? when Funcom isn't making enough money from subs to run servers, put out updates and expansions, and ultimately just drop all support for the game.
Also, Funcom is going to be penalized no-matter-what for making it run on computers that need to be upgraded. They're penalizing themselves for making something most mid-range gaming PCs won't be able to run at the moment, which is technically their fault for being inconsiderate towards the class of people who only have low to mid-range PCs. That's a good majority of people, which probably exceeds people with high-range computers by a major amount. And for the person who said you don't want something that will be "dead on day 1"... well, if you have a game that you can't run during your first impression of that game, you're probably not going to sit around and say, "Well, in a couple of months I'll just upgrade my computer and start playing." The beauty of being one of the first to play the game and having more games pushed into the PC gaming market is going to just overshadow AoC until the point where you don't want to play. Maybe 1/5 of the people who couldn't play it will return over time, but that's not many. |
|
| |
||
|
terrant 5/28/08 6:43:45 PM
|
||