Age of Conan

Another review in : http://jolt.co.uk/index.php?articleid=11458   scoring 8.4 just like the user base here at mmorpg.com make it.

Summing up they say:

Not exactly a ringing endorsement. They gave it an 8.4 after that comment? Odd.

"Yeah, its a great game, though players are leaving to see if FC can bring it up to release quality".

So there saying It looks nice, but Its unfinshed, unpolished, theres no end game and  don't play it for a while, and they give it a 8.4 how do these reviewers work out there scores?

Reviews like that make me wonder...really wonder if there isn't some kind of money being exchanged somewhere.

Originally posted by Bladeinhand

So there saying It looks nice, but Its unfinshed, unpolished, theres no end game and  don't play it for a while, and they give it a 8.4 how do these reviewers work out there scores?

I remember reading somewhere that online reviews based in the UK are generally positive compared to US reviews in anything that is reviewed online in any market.

You could read the comments on the ratings for the gamer too here on mmorpg.com. People here gave it the same score averaged out so far.

This review is also was done a month after release, everyones experience can be completely different. For example I've seen my fair share of bugs but not as many as some peoples experience in game, i've also seen alot of bugs fixed the past few weeks too.

This review takes into consideration whats happening now over the potential, but still recognises it for what it is based on the reviewers experiences.

My thoughts generally mirror he outcome from this review in terms of experience and score given roughly.

*PS nice pic Teala.

Its unfinished, unpolished and many launch day players will be waiting for the game to get upto par before they resubscribe. 8.4/10

Yeah... thats kinda like your english teacher saying "Your paper had no punctuation, rambles on without a point and makes no sense what so ever. So I gave you a B because I feel you will do better as time goes on."

I think that many of the reviewers these days are just giving 'safe' reviews to avoid flak and fallout from angry mobs who will be out for thier blood if the review is less than favorable. So they say what they see in other reviews/articles and setup a score based on the general consensus.

*PS nice pic Teala.

If thats Teala in RL, she's pretty good looking!

Damn! Where are all the good looking MMO nerd girls with glasses who understand when I say "you give good buff!"

Lousey male-dominated genre..

Edit: No offence meant Teala!

This review, like every other "8-9" score seems to be based on playing Tort and nothing after. They get a complementary game and some advertising revenue, play low-lvl tutorial then rush a score out to meet dead lines. Same every time.

Originally posted by Teala

Reviews like that make me wonder...really wonder if there isn't some kind of money being exchanged somewhere.

It truly amazes me to see comments like this on public forums, i feel truly sorry for people who think that way. Seriously this is SAD!!!

I mean i see all sorts of KIDS speaking about anyone who might be slightly postive to be payed or a chill or whatever, seriously are we back at kindergarden school again to see such silly comments? Afcourse there might be people payed to advertise or whatever, but to comment on each thing slightly positive is really strange and i would expect better from you Teala. But then again following the carrot is what most of the complainers seem to enjoy or was it the bandwagon?