| Thread (8 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
cveselis 7/19/07 2:12:37 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 5/08/05 |
Or would you rather see entirely too many servers (as in WoWs case) most with low-medium populations?
Personally I would rather see populations that are very close to their cap. To me it makes the game more fun when there are tons of other people running around. I know it makes questing annoying sometimes. For example having to wait for mob spawns...But from the sounds of the public quest system in this game that won't be an issue. I think it might also make world-RvR more fun if the server is stacked...
Your thoughts? |
|
|
|
||
|
Ferusa 7/19/07 2:26:33 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 7/19/07
Law is mind without reason. |
I would rather see higher populations on less servers, your opinions are completely right, I think there are way too many WoW servers, though PvP isnt the biggest thing there, its also hard to find a decent guild/find a group on those low pop servers...the one downside (this is why WoW made so many servers, and i hope War doesnt have the same problem) is people getting angry about lag issues, do to the max pop and high ques, hopefully they have a reasonable amount of people allowed, and there servers are good, thus my fantasy would be fulfilled. |
|
| Though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. |
||
|
cveselis 7/19/07 2:29:53 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 5/08/05 |
Originally posted by Ferusa
From my understanding Blizzard did not invest in the highest quality servers, and that was one of the reasons for a lot of the issues. That information may prove to be untrue, but in any case I would love to see maxed out severs. If I remember correctly they said they wanted 10,000 players per server. Which would be awesome. I suspect they would cap each side at 5,000 players as well. |
|
|
|
||
|
Kyleran 7/19/07 2:36:50 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
"In EVE, no one gives a damn about a fair fight." - chafin |
I always prefer to play on highly populated servers, I learned my lesson long ago about the problems of lower pop servers, especially as the game ages..... Also, I really think they should cap each faction side... to try and even out the populations between the two realms...don't want to see some of the inbalances that WOW had, especially since realm based combat is so important to this game's design. |
|
| "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon EVE Cult member since May 2007 Regarding EVE: "To be honest, I think God himself created this game." - Shek "Well, sure it exists, but software that exists, but never releases, is nonetheless vaporware" Ihmotepp |
||
|
Ferusa 7/19/07 2:49:16 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 7/19/07
Law is mind without reason. |
Originally posted by cveselis If it is 10,000 that is just simply, brilliant. And yeah, all of the first WoW servers sucked hardware wise..they didnt upgrade until about a year later , and by that time, everyone was invested in there server already. |
|
| Though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. |
||
|
cptnj4 7/19/07 4:51:40 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 7/06/07 |
Give me a few high population servers over tons of low population servers any day. I wonder how many of the current WoW servers would be considered ghost towns... |
|
| |
||
|
midgey555 7/19/07 5:58:26 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 9/03/06 |
Im not too crazy about those extremely overpopulated servers. I think medium sized servers are best for me. |
|
| |
||
|
nennafir 7/19/07 7:08:13 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 10/13/05 |
I want their to be high pop servers, but I don't want lag or queues. Basically, I want the highest population possible while still keeping things stable. Hopefully their code will be up to the challenge. |
|
| |
||