<
>

Page 1 of 64

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Last

All Posts by Thillian - 1274 found

8/03/08 6:46 AM
Viewed 358, Replies 9

Originally posted by Vrika

We all know that WoW graphics aren't technically good.

But you have intentionally chosen a low resulution picture wich is mostly close-up of some bones and barren ground from WoW, whereas Alone in the Dark 1 picture is intentionally kept at the size of the postage stamp to hide the fact that it's actually inferior to WoW. The thread is nothing more than trolling where you try to make WoW look bad.

 


 

Look Sherlock, your deduction is simply breathtaking, but you still missed one point.

8/03/08 5:29 AM
Viewed 358, Replies 9

Take a deep breath, calm down, call forth composure,..  and look at these two pictures. Be honest even if you are a WoW fan and admit the graphics in Alone in the Dark are much nicer.

The first picture is from Alone in the Dark 1 (1992), probably one of the first 3D video games. The second is from WoW (2004).

 

 

8/03/08 5:04 AM
Viewed 4256, Replies 126

Originally posted by Vicksburg

Here is what I call REAL PVP speed: tense - hard - frantic

Watch the beautiful dynamic lightings and new shadow graphics.

Makes the competition real pale in these kind of things doesn't it....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YE6Jga_8ho

 

:)))))) Wow


 

Did you just use the word beatiful for WoW graphics? Seriously I think Alone in the Dark 1 had better graphics not talking yet about Betrayal at Krondor. That was a real beauty in compare to WoW.

8/03/08 4:58 AM
Viewed 1029, Replies 34

Originally posted by needalife214

the DP in WAR is like DAoC it is not about the gear degrading or weapons breaking it is about the time you loose running back 

 

Sort of like hockey how when you get a power play because the other team is short a player..it does not always lead to a goal but think about if the other team lost three or five guys????

 

DAoC was intense when you were fighting on the other realm and your rezers got killed  it was eather fight and win then run  or run then hide or loose  lol

 

there are no corspe runs!! that is the important part


 

How would you translate icing into this hockey-WAR scheme?

8/02/08 7:14 AM
Viewed 447, Replies 10

To even go to an extreme. Good players are able to do anything without the right class setup. Last time we did the whole CD in 3 loremasters a hunter and a two champions. I'd say all classes have the same group value.

8/02/08 7:11 AM
Viewed 447, Replies 10

I dare to disagree with the group importance of Loremasters. LM is definetly very high. Good LM makes a huge difference. In addition LM can act as a healer in 80% cases instead of minstrel. I would say the group of classes that are most needed are : guardians, minstrels, loremasters. Then the rest. In addition LM has no buffs at all. LM is basically a debuffer/messmerizer/healer/dispeller.

Nevertheless each class has something to add for the group. Hunter is great for instant travel to many zones. Champion is the only class with good AoE damage. Captain has best buffs in game. Burglar can messmerize and open conjuctions. Guardian is an obvious tank, minstrel an obvious healer and loremaster I already described.

 

 

8/02/08 6:41 AM
Viewed 447, Replies 10

In fact if you do all the deed grinds in every zone, it's quite possible to level up pretty fast.

8/02/08 6:04 AM
Viewed 1103, Replies 33

Im pretty sure he meant mount gear like horseshoes, bardings, saddlebags..

8/02/08 5:51 AM
Viewed 2013, Replies 88

You should add another poll to it with a question "Were you honest with the previous poll?"

7/31/08 4:38 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Thillian
Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Thillian
Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Shlomo

Well the warcraft - Warhammer, Starcraft - Warhammer 40k is a no brainer. Have never seen the article that people are talking about but ..... Damn... Warcraft 2 was just to much with the dwarfs flying unit ... hehe. A well no one cares and so on.

No one has ever seen the article he's talking about...at least not in the US and not on the internet.  It was only in a small Slovakian magazine this is no longer in business...because of course they know these things in Slovakia.

Somehow after reading you sarcastic post, I don't feel insulted. Probably, because you rather insulted yourself with your own arrogance rather than Slovakian magazines.

Anyway after re-reading that old thread, I m quite confused what are you waiting for, because I made a pretty clear statement that I am not gonna scan anything for you even if you beg me on your knees.

Sorry you misunderstood, let me explain.  When I said "because of course they know these things in Slovakia", that was not being sarcastic, it was when I said I was still waiting for the pic is when I was being sarcastic. :)

Hope that clears it up.


 

Nono you misunderstood. I actually was being sarcastic about not scanning it for you. Im scanning it right now and soon ill paste it here...


 

LOL.  Thanks man.  I needed a good laugh.

Finally someone got the point of all this forum-discussion.

7/31/08 4:20 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Daffid011
Originally posted by Thillian 

Anyway after re-reading that old thread, I m quite confused what are you waiting for, because I made a pretty clear statement that I am not gonna scan anything for you even if you beg me on your knees.


Is your credibility so pristine that people should just always take your word for the honest truth.  Even when you make claims that are so outlandish they are unbelievable?

 

I suggest if you can't back up your statements and references, then perhaps you should not post them in the first place.  Enough of this bullshit about secret friends you know and articles no one else has ever heard of.


 

Daffid please go do something else for at least an hour. This is between me and pappy now.

7/31/08 4:13 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Thillian
Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Shlomo

Well the warcraft - Warhammer, Starcraft - Warhammer 40k is a no brainer. Have never seen the article that people are talking about but ..... Damn... Warcraft 2 was just to much with the dwarfs flying unit ... hehe. A well no one cares and so on.

No one has ever seen the article he's talking about...at least not in the US and not on the internet.  It was only in a small Slovakian magazine this is no longer in business...because of course they know these things in Slovakia.

Somehow after reading you sarcastic post, I don't feel insulted. Probably, because you rather insulted yourself with your own arrogance rather than Slovakian magazines.

Anyway after re-reading that old thread, I m quite confused what are you waiting for, because I made a pretty clear statement that I am not gonna scan anything for you even if you beg me on your knees.

Sorry you misunderstood, let me explain.  When I said "because of course they know these things in Slovakia", that was not being sarcastic, it was when I said I was still waiting for the pic is when I was being sarcastic. :)

Hope that clears it up.


 

Nono you misunderstood. I actually was being sarcastic about not scanning it for you. Im scanning it right now and soon ill paste it here...

7/31/08 3:46 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Pappy13
Originally posted by Shlomo

Well the warcraft - Warhammer, Starcraft - Warhammer 40k is a no brainer. Have never seen the article that people are talking about but ..... Damn... Warcraft 2 was just to much with the dwarfs flying unit ... hehe. A well no one cares and so on.


 

No one has ever seen the article he's talking about...at least not in the US and not on the internet.  It was only in a small Slovakian magazine this is no longer in business...because of course they know these things in Slovakia.


 

Somehow after reading you sarcastic post, I don't feel insulted. Probably, because you rather insulted yourself with your own arrogance rather than Slovakian magazines.

Anyway after re-reading that old thread, I m quite confused what are you waiting for, because I made a pretty clear statement that I am not gonna scan anything for you even if you beg me on your knees.

7/31/08 2:57 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

You're flattering me if you stil remember what I wrote here even a year ago. I hardly remember who you are. Can you refresh my memory a little?

7/31/08 2:26 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Wau, another long post about the same thing. You really should reconsider what are you trying to achieve here.

7/31/08 12:22 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Daffid011

What on earth makes you think it is my responsibility to prove you wrong?  Not that I haven't, but when you present rumors and speculation as statements of FACT, then you are being untruth... blahblah...


 

Speculation for you, fact for me. I am not gonna reveal you the source, because it's simply impossible. Anyway, apart from this, the whole discussion is rather pointless. You are trying to claim here that WoW is a good game, because milions play it and that it doesnt matter it has absolutely no originality. I disagree. End of discussion. Thank you for your opinion.

 

7/31/08 2:53 AM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Daffid stop calling me a liar. You can not prove me wrong and just because I am not gonna reveal you my source doesnt mean I'm lying. Noone is forcing you to believe what I write. Forums are all about rumours and gossip. But calling a liar is a bit too much. I am working as a gameplay designer for eastern europe single player RPG's (last one was very successful even in US) . and I hardly can give you any source for my claims, because some of the information were not official released.

I was saying WoW ripped off AC2 from the very beginning of WoW"s existence. You can see my posts history if you bother. It did not ripped EQ nor DaoC to that extent as it ripped AC2. From battle ground system and ranking throught the thousands of solo easy quests with no xp death penalties, same world rules, same crafting, same combat..

You've got to bring some better argument into this discussion that just millions play it. Is this all you manage? I tried to read your post a few times. But the only reason ou gave why we should think WoW is good is that it is played by a milion people.

I am not doing what masses do in other areas. I am not wearing the same clothes as majority, I am not eating the same food, nor listening to the same music and I don't like mass-popular movies and blockbusters either.

7/31/08 2:42 AM
Viewed 1225, Replies 36

1) 3 spheres independent from each other (diplomacy, crafting, adventuring). It's not just a marketing slogan.

2) Classes and combat mechanics are fantastic.

3) Zoneless world with no limits. You can get anywhere you want.

4) Flying Mounts, Ships, non-instanced housing.

7/30/08 2:11 PM
Viewed 2121, Replies 80

Originally posted by Daffid011

 

10 WoW cloned EQ and didn't create anything new.

20 Everyone is cloning WoW and not creating anything new.

30 got 10

Has anyone ever stopped to ask, if WoW is just an EQ clone and everyone else is cloning WoW then why is WoW so much more popular? 


 

The answer is so simple. Marketing & Advertisment. Look at Asheron's Call 2 made by Turbine. It was a game with 99% of the features WoW had at release. WoW could be called Asheron's Call 2.5

At that time most of the players were hardcore in today's terms. They found AC2 to be too easy, made for carebears and casuals. The problem was that Turbine could not sell AC2 because they lack marketing and advertisment to bring new people into genre.

What Blizzard did was simple. They made this AC2 ripoff called WoW and payed huge marketing for it and publicity to bring new players into MMORPG. The majority of old mmorpg players DID not like WoW at all just like they did not like AC2, but WoW was filling up with all the newcommers to the genre, that it eventually became a legend that "there is something good about the game when milions of play it" so even the old school players jumped into WoW.

Mass hysteria is the explanation for its success. Not a quality. Do you really believe people can SEE QUALITY? It's so naive I can hardly breathe. Do you really believe that an average person is able to see quality and is able to make a responsible decision? I say no, an average person will always fall with the hype and play what milions of others play.

I say, the fact that something is popular in compare to competition means the quality is low but marketing is high. And it applies to everything (music, cinema, food, clothing, politics..)

7/28/08 10:08 AM
Viewed 936, Replies 21

Originally posted by Elrynduil

I am fully aware of the monetary cost of keeping an MMO going. 200k subscribers is more than enough. Look at UO, a successful but very much niche game that never had a massive player base.

 

AoC was always a niche game. It won't have millions of players. If you're too shallow and immature to play a game because of that fact then go elsewhere.


 

This is so much untrue. AoC is currently placed second in the amount of money spent on advertisment (after WoW). AoC is mainstreamed MMORPG with plans to keep 300-400k subscribers otherwise they have to start kicking half of the dev team.

Page 1 of 64

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Last

Legend

Locked
Hot (25+ Posts)
New Posts
No New Posts