|
|
5/02/08 1:43 AM
|
|
Viewed 2747, Replies 56
|
|
Max (aka 80). Multiple times. |
|
|
|
5/02/08 1:04 AM
|
|
Viewed 2747, Replies 56
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/02/08 12:50 AM
|
|
Viewed 240, Replies 10
|
|
|
That screenshot seems to have been touched up. Don't worry, that boat won't stay afloat for long ;) |
|
|
|
5/02/08 12:28 AM
|
|
Viewed 488, Replies 21
|
|
Originally posted by D3mis3 Start the game in windowed mode the first time it runs, see if it helps. Then switch back to full screen once it loads. You need to do this just once (at least I did). Also, if you're on Vista, 4GB memory total helps a lot. And it's the cheapest part of the computer nowadays. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 11:49 PM
|
|
Viewed 3819, Replies 78
|
|
Originally posted by fatpanda The fileplanet event is not the closed beta test, so you're not restricted by the closed beta NDA. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 6:29 PM
|
|
Viewed 776, Replies 46
|
|
|
There are no magic builds. On the other hand, the gold version is not the released version. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 6:27 PM
|
|
Viewed 776, Replies 46
|
|
Originally posted by Ascension08Originally posted by Wharg0ul"Keeping it wrapped up like a present", eh Warg0ul? The level restriction to 13 is more of a storyline natural progression barrier than a level barrier. If they up the level cap, they up more of the storyline killing all the surprises. I understand that some people may not be that interested for the storyline, but since the game is heavily influenced by it, they may need to realise that this game might not be for them. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 6:15 PM
|
|
Viewed 776, Replies 46
|
|
|
I don't recall a company lifting their CLOSED beta NDA. In fact, the majority besides perhaps the Asian based MMOs don't (even they don't, they are just more laxed). Open beta NDA is already lifted. Yes, there is a level cap restriction. No, it's not the only company that had a level cap restriction for Open beta. No need for panic. Stay tuned for the opinion of those who will play the open beta. If it's not enough for you and you are still interested in the game (interested in playing, not posting on some forum such as this), then wait for the free trial that is bound to come a couple months after release. Or maybe grab a buddy key from somebody. If you're absolutely adamant that you need to be in the game from day -1 (without doing proper research), then you will need to realise that you're gambling. And those who gamble accept the risk. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 6:05 PM
|
|
Viewed 1709, Replies 77
|
|
|
I'm not sure what agenda Alanon is holding, but if you look beyond all the negativity, it seems that he's totally convinced that the 1-13 gameplay will be a first class experience, while what's not shown will not be. I say that because he's not touching at all what's about to be shown and only tackles what's hidden from the public eye. It will be interesting to know the basis of this distinction between the two parts of the game. If the only distinction is what's shown and what is not, then I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned, it's not a very solid basis of an argument against the game. With every bit of information released, those negatively biased seem to take a step back at a time. Right now we moved past the combat mechanics and moved to the 1-13 content. Soon enough it'll be the 1-80 content. Then end PvP or end PvE content and so on. I wonder when people will find a real issue with the game (instead of the possibility that such a problem might exist). The coming weeks will be most interesting indeed. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 5:22 PM
|
|
Viewed 1709, Replies 77
|
|
|
This whole argument is a tad pointless unless we gather some information on how the game is perceived at levels 1-13. If the general consensus is positive, then we can start worrying about later levels and content in it (some of us anyway). If the general consensus is negative however, the whole argument about the level barrier is pointless. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 12:47 PM
|
|
Viewed 1236, Replies 52
|
|
|
LOTRO patched 1.07 live today. Guess what, they had a 2 hours extra delay to their scheduled maintenance. It's the nature of the beast and you'd better get used to it ;) |
|
|
|
5/01/08 10:41 AM
|
|
Viewed 1844, Replies 83
|
|
|
Here is a prime example of somebody who is not fit to beta test anything. And doesn't know what he's paying for and to who either. Way to go ;) |
|
|
|
5/01/08 7:10 AM
|
|
Viewed 143, Replies 13
|
|
|
Only the 1-5 beach-to-Tortage outer gate part is single player. The rest of the game is multiplayer except for one quest chain line. The destiny quest line however is not optional, you can't get off the island unless you complete it. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 4:33 AM
|
|
Viewed 211, Replies 26
|
|
|
I've made lots of good RL friends. Does that count? |
|
|
|
5/01/08 3:48 AM
|
|
Viewed 572, Replies 13
|
|
|
The first hour(s) with everyone rushing to get in will be interesting indeed :) |
|
|
|
5/01/08 3:25 AM
|
|
Viewed 2008, Replies 63
|
|
|
Actually the biggest downside is not the latency, it's the unfriendly siege scheduling timing. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 3:22 AM
|
|
Viewed 840, Replies 25
|
|
|
Just in case you're not actually a troll, you will find the discussion below: |
|
|
|
5/01/08 3:19 AM
|
|
Viewed 840, Replies 25
|
|
|
A freshly made account with a post that links to another thread, just so as to generate some negative spin. Smells troll to me. Your concerns would be as valid posted in the original thread created for it. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 3:03 AM
|
|
Viewed 5405, Replies 169
|
|
|
To Ngeldu5t: So according to this logic, LOTRO is a flop because it didn't allow unrestricted access in OB? I would expect grindfests without a story to allow unrestricted access. But lately it seems that the games with a strong backstory seem to want to prevent players from spoiling all the surprises. This is not the first game that has level restrictions, nor will it be the last. The game might be unpolished after the starting areas, but the level restriction is not a direct indication of such a thing. It just raises concerns. |
|
|
|
5/01/08 2:59 AM
|
|
Viewed 5405, Replies 169
|
|
|
To jayanti: You're disregarding two points though. First one is that a portion of the people that will enter the beta are already Fileplanet members. Thus, Fileplanet gains nothing additional from them. On the other hand, some people have probably singned up for Fileplanet membership with the hope that they might get in the OB, but didn't make it. Those two groups are unknown to us, but can make a difference in the perceived Fileplanet profit. The second is that you assume that Fileplanet will distribute the retail version (maybe I'm reading what you say incorrectly). This is not going to happen as EIDOS has exclusive publishing rights. What might happen is that Fileplanet may get to distribute future standalone patches, in the same manner LOTRO is doing. The third is ... well, related to the way they distribute keys. How will Fileplanet distinguish players that joined the service for the beta from players that joined the service for the general merits of it? Fileplanet paying Funcom for the added income from additional subscriptions implies that the distinction is very clear and verifiable by Funcom. I'm still not convinced that Funcom is getting anything out of this deal in terms of funds. |
|