Lord of the Rings Online
Show Game Details
- Developer: Turbine, Inc.
- Genre: Fantasy
- Status: Final
- Platforms:
- Website: http://lotro.turbine.com/
- Retail Price: 19.99 BUY IT
- Monthly Fee: 14.99
-
Lord of the Rings Online RSS Feed
Lord of the Rings Online » General Discussion » Is this game a sandbox?
| Thread (43 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Kyleran 8/19/08 1:29:57 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
"In EVE, no one gives a damn about a fair fight." - chafin |
Originally posted by Sovrath
Better stick with the day job Sov, psychology isn't your strong suit. I play EVE, and yet am a fairly anti-social person/player. I have no great loyalties, make no real friends, I'm sort of a wanderer going from place to place looking for adventure. In my first year of EVE I've fought in Stealth fleets, helped take down player owned stations by the score, helped my corporation in mining or shipping operations, refilled stations to keep our manufacturing engines rolling, fought in large fleet engagements and been destroyed by Titans. I've killed many, made a decent living (by no means a rich player), avoided all mining, flown cover for others, begun building up a base of steady income that I don't actually have to work for. I can fly scout, probe out hidden fleets, jam the enemy so they can't return fire and let loose with long range guns that others can't come close to matching. I've fought directly against the largest empire in the game (BOB) and along side some of the games other big hitters (Goonswarm who are one crazy bunch) and Red Army (who says you need to understand your allies to actually coordinate a fight) I've had my alliances utterly wiped from the universe, and at the same time, have been on the winning side and seen other alliances vanish from the game. I'm currently fighting in an empire corp which uses wardecs to get its pvp fix and its added a whole new dimension to EVE for me. The only questing I do is mission running, as I find it an easy way to make cash at times. Ratting in 0.0 is another favorite activity, as I prefer things that involve shooting things as a means to make an income. And yet, there's so much I haven't experienced yet. So much to look forward in my 2nd year. I've only scratched the surface of what is possible in EVE, and I think I've got a long run ahead of me. Sandbox style games such as EVE offer so many more opportunities to define your own role in a game, but they are not for everyone. I'm afraid I'm I'm damaged now, the standard, quest driven, level based, no risk/reward for pvp type game just isn't that interesting anymore. (to me)
|
|
| "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon EVE Cult member since May 2007 Regarding EVE: "To be honest, I think God himself created this game." - Shek "Well, sure it exists, but software that exists, but never releases, is nonetheless vaporware" Ihmotepp |
||
|
DonnieBrasco 8/19/08 2:30:16 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 7/25/06
Achiever 80.00% |
Originally posted by Wolfkrone
Oh it's fine, but it doesn't offer anything new. What LoTRO has to offer (apart from being able to roleplay in the LoTRO universe or it's music system) is not enough to warrant buying it. While the landscape graphics are lovely, the character models are lacking. Combat itself is boring and (suprisingly) inferior to WoW's (I am a WoW critic, I absolutely hate that game), the only thing that makes you different from somebody else in your class (combat wise) are traits. PvP is also lacking, PvMP revolves around controlling several forts in the Ettenmoors, I will admit however that LoTRO was not designed with hardcore PvP in mind. Quests, same old kill this/gather that, the storyline quests are the only relief but they don't happen enough (and are not unique either, when you compare them to other MMORPG's on the market). Player Housing is all instanced and not something overly great, it doesn't topple the best player housing currently in a MMORPG (which is SWG, a shame they ruined that game). The Classes themselves are quite cliche for a fantasy MMO, there is only a small number of them too (when compared to some other Fantasy MMORPG's). Crafting, it's basic, simplistic and does not add to the MMORPG genre at all, it's also inferior to the best crafting currently in an MMORPG (once again, this belongs to SWG). Character creation is bare, especially when compared to games such as SWG and AoC. There is some good points to LoTRO. The appearance system, it's good that you can choose the appearance of one item but wear a different one for stats, however, it's not unique (think Everquest II). Art Style, the art style in this game is lovely, items themselves are very well done, it's not often you'll see atrocious looking pieces of crap which plague WoW. Music System, a great idea that's executed well, it can be fun to chill out and just screw around with various notes, you can download ABC files and tell the game to play that file while sitting back and listening. Lore, probably the main selling point to LoTRO is the fact it's Lord of the fuckin Rings, probably one of the best fantasy stories ever, if your a roleplayer or a LOTR fan you will love LoTRO. What you're desribing above is all a matter of personal taste, nothing more. I did not mean to debate those, I merely countered your argument, in which you said that only fans of the LOTR universe would enjoy that game. That is not true, myself being one example of the opposite. DB |
|
| Denial makes one look a lot dumber than he/she actually is. |
||
|
Wolfkrone 8/19/08 5:19:29 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/19/08 |
Originally posted by DonnieBrasco
Oh it's fine, but it doesn't offer anything new. What LoTRO has to offer (apart from being able to roleplay in the LoTRO universe or it's music system) is not enough to warrant buying it. While the landscape graphics are lovely, the character models are lacking. Combat itself is boring and (suprisingly) inferior to WoW's (I am a WoW critic, I absolutely hate that game), the only thing that makes you different from somebody else in your class (combat wise) are traits. PvP is also lacking, PvMP revolves around controlling several forts in the Ettenmoors, I will admit however that LoTRO was not designed with hardcore PvP in mind. Quests, same old kill this/gather that, the storyline quests are the only relief but they don't happen enough (and are not unique either, when you compare them to other MMORPG's on the market). Player Housing is all instanced and not something overly great, it doesn't topple the best player housing currently in a MMORPG (which is SWG, a shame they ruined that game). The Classes themselves are quite cliche for a fantasy MMO, there is only a small number of them too (when compared to some other Fantasy MMORPG's). Crafting, it's basic, simplistic and does not add to the MMORPG genre at all, it's also inferior to the best crafting currently in an MMORPG (once again, this belongs to SWG). Character creation is bare, especially when compared to games such as SWG and AoC. There is some good points to LoTRO. The appearance system, it's good that you can choose the appearance of one item but wear a different one for stats, however, it's not unique (think Everquest II). Art Style, the art style in this game is lovely, items themselves are very well done, it's not often you'll see atrocious looking pieces of crap which plague WoW. Music System, a great idea that's executed well, it can be fun to chill out and just screw around with various notes, you can download ABC files and tell the game to play that file while sitting back and listening. Lore, probably the main selling point to LoTRO is the fact it's Lord of the fuckin Rings, probably one of the best fantasy stories ever, if your a roleplayer or a LOTR fan you will love LoTRO. What you're desribing above is all a matter of personal taste, nothing more. I did not mean to debate those, I merely countered your argument, in which you said that only fans of the LOTR universe would enjoy that game. That is not true, myself being one example of the opposite. DB
Alright. I'll change my statement to 'you would enjoy yourself in a more 'fleshed out' MMORPG'. ;) |
|
| |
||
|
DonnieBrasco 8/19/08 5:48:28 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 7/25/06
Achiever 80.00% |
Originally posted by Wolfkrone
Better... :) but would still be more fair using the first person: "I am enjoying myself myself in a more "fleshed out" MMORPG" :) Noone can speak for other's tastes in great confidence! Glad you got my point though :) DB |
|
| Denial makes one look a lot dumber than he/she actually is. |
||
|
green13 8/19/08 7:35:05 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/02/06 |
Originally posted by Sovrath
People seeking social interaction is creepy? That's a novel view. Just to offer a different one, what distinguishes sandbox style games from eg. games like WoW, is the emphasis on players. It is, like you say, less about coded game content (or questing as you put it) and more about other players. Quests are a bit like single player offline games. The only difference is they're set in a world you share with other players, and you can interact with those players while completing the quests. Sandbox style games create a world environment in which that player interaction is the game, eg. via:
The advantage of sandbox games is that they're less predictable. The disadvantage is that they're less predictable. Supposedly you're less likely to get bored, because players are less predictable. On the other hand, it's very difficult to control the quality of the game experience. IMO, this is why there aren't any really successful sandbox mmos on the market. Players are complex and unpredictable, and designing environments in which they will provide a quality game experience - without any game content and to suit the tastes of a broad audience - is nigh impossible. The answer is what it so often is - a middle road. Most of the big mmos in development since WoW's release have tried to offer both, which is the ideal. If there's quest content + elements of sandbox gameplay, and players can pick or choose as they like, then that's the safer bet. Pure sandbox mmos are not. Like others have pointed out, Middle Earth Online was going to be fairly sandboxy. LOTRO sits much closer to WoW. |
|
| |
||
|
seabass2003 8/19/08 8:46:13 PM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/31/05
Why the hell should I work? She''ll just spend all my money on shoes anyways! |
If you really want a sanbox game. Try Roma Victor. |
|
| |
||
|
Rytif 8/20/08 12:14:38 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 9/14/04 |
Originally posted by ketrine
EVE Online is a sandbox. Just because you have been obliterated in it doesn't change simple facts. It also counters barbie playing men like yourself. |
|
| |
||
|
Rytif 8/20/08 12:19:27 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 9/14/04 |
Originally posted by ketrine
Two things: 1.) I said there arent any GOOD sandboxes on the market now IMO. Eve is a sandbox, granted, but In my very very humble opinion it is not a good one because my character has no legs with which to jump. I need legs before its a good MMO. You cant put on pink shoes without feet, and I hate outer space unless I can run around the spaceship decorating it. 2.) A spaceship is a metal chunk of electronics floating in space. (as far as I am concerned) Personal opinion doesn't change the fact it's a sandbox. PERIOD. EVE Online is a very good example of a sandbox and probably the ONLY good sandbox out right now. You are completely arrogant, or if you aren't... then you are simply a troll. Take either one, let's hope it's the latter because if not, you have some real mental issues. =) I find it hard to believe players such as yourself exist then again you may be a wannabe gamer. All in all, have a good day. |
|
| |
||
|
kedoremos 8/21/08 9:13:33 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/12/05
"What the fuck is a robster craw?" |
Originally posted by Lizard_SF
Ok first what's wrong with the word typo? Second I’m not talking about little mistakes like putting an a instead of an e in sentence. The OP butchered his whole post. You have to agree. If you don’t then your just being argumentative.
You do not use an apostrophe to indicate plurals. Apostrophes are used to indicate contractions (It's==It is) or possessives (The bee's knees). It is not used to warn the reader that an 's' might be coming. Also, it should be "you're just being", that is, "You are just being". "Your" is used to indicate possession, again, "This is your boat". On the other hand, you *could* have said "Ur just being", so, props for not doing that. It is a fundamental rule of the internet that any post critiquing grammar or spelling will, itself, contain such errors. It is unavoidable. I just found your (not you're) post especially amusing. And of course I'm being argumentative. This is the Internet. (And I know you shouldn't start sentences with and. But I do it anyway. Also, you shouldn't start sentences with but. The irony continues to mount...)
You are my new God.
|
|
|
kedoremos 8/21/08 9:18:24 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 12/12/05
"What the fuck is a robster craw?" |
Originally posted by Sovrath
Yeah, that's what I heard. A friend of mine played SWG and told me it was like a virtual job. I'm starting to think that people who want this sandbox style game are really just looking for social interaction. There is no questing per se so you basically seek out other players. They are not looking so much for a game but for online friends. If this is indeed the case it borders on a little creepy to my thinking.
MY irony meter is pegging. [-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-] (11) Hint: You just posted that on a forum dedicated to online-only video games. |
|
|
unherdninja 8/21/08 9:20:28 PM
|
||

