Profile: Nasica
Send PM  Forum Posts  Forum Topics 

Recent Forum Posts [more...]

• • The time has arrived..... finally

  • Hey guys,

    Well the time has finally arrived, i enlist in the Royal Australian Navy in les than 12 hours.
    Thanks to all those people here who have supported me and have helped me through some tough times (Very special thanks to Draenor, Bluberryhaze and razorback)
    Hopefully this is going to be the start of a very successful Navy career, and a safe one at that.
    
    I will try to keep in touch, but im sure Recruit School will be quite short of free time, so if i dont get a chance, i will talk to you all in 11weeks, and let you know how it went.

    I have already planned to follow most of the suggestions in the previous thread (although i wont be turning up hungover :P)
    
    Thanks again guys, and ill talk to you all soon

    Nasica

  • Posted: 9/21/08 8:14 AM
    General Discussion
• • Ok, now im starting to get scared.

  • Hey guys,

    I thought some of you might be interested to know that i have received my 'date'.

    Yep, Sept 22nd 2008 will be day one of my Navy career.  After a EXTREMELY long process and some scares along the way (They thought they discovered i had heart disease at one stage) all that is left now is my multi-stage fitness test (which i can do easy) and i dont mind telling you that im absolutely scared shitless.

    I know there are quite a few current and ex sevice-men on this forum, so i would just like to know how you felt when you left for the military? How long did it last? I assume basic training will be so busy i wont have time to think about anything else. Any tips for a new recruit for a sucessfull first step out of civilian-land?
    
    Thanks guys, i look forward to your answers.

  • Posted: 8/31/08 6:06 AM
    General Discussion
• • So why are they letting the Large Hadron Collider go?

  • www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/04/08/2211092.htm

     

    There is absolutely nothing to worry about with the LHC, people should stop getting caught up in ridiculous internet spread myths.

    I, personally, look forward to the answer to one of the greatest questions in science... what is mass ?

  • Posted: 8/28/08 5:19 AM
    General Discussion
• • A sad day for conspiracist theorists

  • Originally posted by xplororor
    

    Originally posted by Enigma
    

    careful, Nasica. Mr Poopypants might put you on block if he feels you are winning the arguement!

    exploror, no offense man. But i pegged you for an intelligent guy. You supporting the conspiracy theory that the US Government was behind the destruction of these towers to get us more oil just made me change my mind on that.

    - No I don't blindly support any theorist.

    - I simply look at things with a cold observation. The US goverment has done many horrific acts in the past, and denied them. One of many examples is listed above by me... it took them 60 years to finally admit the truth. During those 60 years many "conspiracy theorists" were saying the evidence was there that went against the official story.

    - The main subject of this new thread of yours (which a number of posters keep ignoring) is NOT WTC 1, or WTC 2. It is about WTC 7. A smaller skyscraper that was NOT hit by any aircraft. It seemingly caught fire all by itself. Burned for some time, then suddently fell down in a controlled demolition pattern.

    - Meanwhile, all other surrounding skyscrapers (like the super tall hotel directly next to the WTC buildings) did not catch on fire, nor have a single spark. And never fell down at all.)

    - I also posted above, an example of a skyscraper that burned for almost 2 days straight. And never fell down.

    - For years the US goverment's official story about WTC 7 is that diesel fuel inside it caused the fires, and the diesel fuel is what made it fall down. The LINK you posted in this thread is of the goverment now doing a 360 degree change in its official story - now saying no diesel fuel was a factor at all.

    - Add the fact WTC 7 was built to be a bunker for the elite of NYC. Bunkers are made to withstand... bombs, hurricanes, even nukes. Who are the elite of NYC? And how important are they? This wasn't just any "Hollywood" bunker. It was THE bunker. It's were the US president would go hide if he's in the NYC area. And presidents are often in the NYC area. Same with all the UN leaders. Get an idea of how elite level this bunker is?

    What about the 6 points I mentioned just now is false? That's all there is to it. Did a jet hit WTC 7 yes or no? Was WTC 7 built to be a bunker for all the important people of NYC (UN people, visiting leaders of Russia, USA, any other country, etc...) yes or no? Did any of the other skyscrapers next to the WTC buildings catch fire and fall (like the hotel building) yes or no? Did the US goverment on purpose kill innocent American citizens then deny it for 60 years before admitting it? Yes or no?

    Conspiracy theorists makes no damn sense at all.

    That's exactly what was said for 60 years about the example I linked to above.

    1. American Government is so stupid they had to make up a hollywood feature of astronauts going to the moon (Moon conspiracy)

    2.  American Government is so smart they got away with killing over 4000 people and no one has proof to get this people in Jail (including both republican and democratic parties)

    See what I mean?

     My responses are for my gamer buddy Enigma, and all the lurkers here... we are all joined by our love of gaming!   With this said, I'll go a bit deeper. Everyone lurking decide for yourself, check and cross-check all the information at all the links for yourself. Don't go by what I say, or what anyone says. Check and re-check the posted information (and if you have information to share, post your information too ) 

     

     

    Whoah, getting off topic here lol. Another new thread about other theories/subjects. I'll bite ... temporarily ......

    ... It was on the old cSWG forums around 2001 that I first heard this line of thought. I counter-argued that the USA did land on the moon. I disproved all the evidence the other site was listing. I ended up killing the thread LOL! I won't repost it all here but in a nutshell:

      The cold, hard evidence is America did land on the moon. The Flag is there, and viewable by Hubble, as well as anyone with a strong enough telescope. The reason the flag appears to be "blowing in the wind" is because a wire was on purpose put inside the flag to make it NOT fold. With little gravity on the moon, and no wind on the moon, the flag would have not been viewable. So a wire was put inside it, to make it stay unfolded, and thus viewable.

    And of course every single major country had a strong enough telescope to see the rocket reach space, and leave Earth's orbit, and go to the moon.

    Also every HAM radio operator on the planet was able to listen in on everything, including what was censored by NASA before airing on TV.

    It IS possible more "footage" was added to liven things up... simular to how China added more "footage" of the Olympics fireworks to liven things up. Since NASA is a military  branch, then yes. The other military branches have been caught doing things they denied.
    

     

     

    - Next, many high profile, public, criminals get 100% away with breaking the law. All those criminals Bill Clinton pardoned right before the end of his term. They were 100% guilty, with no evidence at all showing otherwise.

    - "Tricky Dick" getting his pardon immediatly after getting caught. Skip the trial baby!!!

    - The American goverment got away for 60 years... as I showed in the above link I posted. During those 60+ years, many Republican, and Democrates were elected to the goverment. ALL of them denied everything.
    

    The US goverment breaking the law, and getting away with it, is nothing new. Again, during those 60 years many Republicans and Democrats were elected. None of them admitted the truth. ALL of them denied the truth.

     

    Republican and Democrate are the same party lol. Both Bush and Kerry were asked about their secret society membership, both refused to say "no". Bush said he could not answer. Kerry laughed like an airhead.

    *** (Note to everyone: Fro some reason MMORPG.com makes all "youtube" urls look the same. I double checked... the YouTube urls all work, they all go to different links, the right links) ****

     youtube.com/watch

    youtube.com/watch

     

    youtube.com/watch

    Notice the cops were standing by him the entire time. (Actually as soon as he entered the room they stayed next to him.) The cops never initially stopped him from entering. Or from questioning Kerry. It's only after the kid askes a certain qustion - about Kerry's secret society membership, - then the cops pounce on him.

    youtube.com/results

    JFK publically talking about secret societies:

    youtube.com/watch

    youtube.com/results

     

    youtube.com/watch

    With this said, with the evidence for secret societies being soo much, soo previlant, that JFK spoke on it, that major news media took it seriously enough to question Bush, to question Kerry, on it....

    It brings up the question, why are these societies "secret"? What is it they want to hide? Are trying to hide? Have already hidden? Are planning to hide? Is the US goverment really in Iraq for oil? Or for something else?  Something else the secret societies running America know about? Something else no one has talked about, no media will ever talk about?

    Why is there a statue of George Washington in the capital of America? A statue of Abe Lincoln? Now why is there a statue of this guy: (What did he do that was soo incredibly signifigant that is was on the level of Washington and Lincoln, that affected all of America? )

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_Square

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morals_and_Dogma_of_the_Ancient_and_Accepted_Scottish_Rite_of_Freemasonry

    If this guy is on the same level as Washington, and Lincoln, why isn't he taught about in all Elementry Schools, High Schools, and Colleges in America?

     

     

    www.thepowerhour.com/news3/flight11_questions.htm

    More links of intrest:

    (Check out the 2 videos at the bottom, after the story)

    dissentmag.wordpress.com/2008/06/15/john-mccain-war-hero-or-north-vietnams-go-to-collaborator/

     

     

    In the same way Arnold Scwartzenegger (sp?) cannot run for US president. There is evidence John McCain is not a natural born American citizen... thus cannot run for president:

    www.dailypaul.com/node/31019

    www.youtube.com/watch

     

     

     

    www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_hopper_video.htm

    www.counterpunch.com/cohen04262008.html

    www.youtube.com/watch

    knowbeforeyouvote.com/

     

    US goverment continues on purpose allowing those in the military to die by withholding the best possible equipment:

    www.youtube.com/watch

     

    But that's getting off topic.

    Here is a fun video for everyone to liven things up ;) (All of you already know to watch it to the very end)

    www.youtube.com/watch

    Perhaps you can answer my question then.

    Why did they drop WTC7 in a controlled demolition, when it would have been infinitely simpler to just blow it up ?
    Why did they want to drop it in a small pile ?
    It make absolutely NO sense at all.

  • Posted: 8/27/08 6:54 AM
    General Discussion
• • A sad day for conspiracist theorists

  • Okay, lets assume that these conspiracy nuts have it right.

    The buildings fell due to a controlled demolition...
    Why ? Why all the effort to carefully drop these buildings in a nice neat pile (comparativly speaking) Controlled demolision take A LOT of planning to do that, why not just blow the building up ? Why put planes in the side of them anyway ? If the government was planning on killing 3000 people, why did they go to so much effort to safely fall the building ?

    Lets assume the only possible answer to this, they made a mistake.

    Is a government who is entirely incapable of making a terrorist attack look like an actual terrorist attack capable of keeping this secret for over 8 years (assuming they actually did any planning) ?

    Moral of the story... even with out the tomes of scientific evidence, expert accounts, years of research to support that the building fell because a plane hit them it in the side it is plain to see for anyone capable of lateral thinking that the conspiracy theories associated with 9/11 do not make a single bit of sense.
    
    
     

  • Posted: 8/26/08 6:04 AM
    General Discussion