| Username | charris1980 |
| Real Name | Chris Harris |
| Rank | Novice Member |
| Joined | September 18, 2006 |
| Gender | male |
| Age | 28 |
| Location | Des Moines, IA, United States |
| Last Visit | August 20, 2008 |
| Post Count | 372 |
| Biography | |
| Quote | "War is messy!" |
So I have a lot of subscriptions out there for MMO's. The problem is I have time invested with all of them and it is hard to let go. I have subscriptions to EvE, WoW, EQ2, AoC, LoTRO, Tabula Rasa, and MxO (even though I have the station pass, so that is one for multiple MMO's).
Anyway it hit me that we should be using some type of global subscription model on how often we play a game per month. Some positive things that can come from this.
Here is the model:
You pay $29.95/mo to an "OSM" (open subscription model) company. That company releases an API that all the game developers can use to keep track of what people have bought and send data back to the OSM on how much playing time per month was done. Then the OSM distributes the 29.95/mo to the appropriate game developers based on how long you played that game.
For instance:
So as you can see the developers will have to really make a great game to keep you playing or using your hours on their game instead of another MMO. It would greatly increase competition and weed out a lot of hype and bad MMO's coming out.
The only flaws I see right now is if you play 4+ games then WoW and them are getting less then they are now. But you know what? If they want to keep you then they will have to work in keeping you playing their game that entire month to actually double their income (from 14.95 to 29.95).
Also you would still have to buy the games (retail) and the expansion packs.
What do you think? Please don't tell me developers won't ever go for it. It isn't an idea to make them do this, it is just a thought and a dream right now. I also realize the OSM needs to make $ to keep services up, maybe a 5% cut on either each game payment or the total 29.95/mo.
28
Originally posted by Amalaric
Originally posted by charris1980
so they bring out a better hero game? better games are a good thing. we wouldn't have the games today without competition.
When did you see a better game from these people than the competition?
EverQuest?
Yes but that was a long time ago.
then you have nothing to worry about here. lol
you made this poll sounding worried they would steal from CoX. if they make a bad game like always then don't worry about DC Universe.
so they bring out a better hero game? better games are a good thing. we wouldn't have the games today without competition.
why do you want a monopoly on super hero MMO? get some competition in there and CoH/CoV will strive to be better. this is good for the gamers of CoH, not bad.
damn my prediction was wrong. i said it would take 6 months to get down to 200k. they beat it by 2-3 months probably ![]()
Would you rather see a game release pushed back a year or have the game release witha few bugs that will be fixed?