| Username | mikevrk |
| Real Name | |
| Rank | Novice Member |
| Joined | February 20, 2006 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | (hidden) |
| Location | Moscow, Russian Federation |
| Last Visit | May 22, 2008 |
| Post Count | 35 |
| Biography | |
| Quote |
well, both the OP and Aion fambois are silly.
after seeing the gameplay video (http://videos.curse.com/details/1376/)
I understood I don't even wanna spend my time on Aion's trial (if there would be any)
nah, I thinks Conan will beat Bloodymare hands down.
gore and maturity is nice, but korean play-style (aka do the same thing 1000 times to get a better knife, and to get nice sword, kill 100000 boars :) - imho it's not for us, europeans (and those overseas :) :)
the Nightmare time idea is rather cool
and if it'll be not too much grindfest
and free-to-play, I;ll give it a try...
ok, I understood about level requirements, and ofc it's stupid...
If you're Orc or Troll or even Tauren - you get to RFC just in time for it to still be available thru LFG search.
Blood Elves (who done all quests in Ghostlands) will never see Ragefire Chasm in that list - and it's really annoying, cos' on of the 4 components for Blood Ranseur is deep inside of that instance...
I agree with level requirements for Meeting Stones,
just (imho) putting level requirements on LFG matchmakin system is way too stupid :(
WoW has non-linear multiple path leveled quests path. and not seeing local dungeon in the list only because you got to that region too late - yukk, it sucks... :(
While others low-level (20+) dungeons are in list (BFD, SFK, WC, etc...)
there's no Ragefire Chasm in that list, so one have to manually join the LFG channel and spam, spam, spam :(
Why ? does anyone else thinks it's not a way it's supposed be ?
What characteristics of an MMORPG do you look at most?