Profile: sh4dowst4lkr
Send PM  Forum Posts  Forum Topics 

Recent Forum Posts [more...]

• • Graphics: Is there no pleasing people?

  • Originally posted by barmbek76
    

    Originally posted by Cbdragon1
    

    I can except the bland landscapes as a sacrifice for mass PvP.  What's confusing is how bad the animations are.  The running annimations for all the Desto. chars I played was very bad.  The spell  and melee animations were really weak too.

    As I said, having average graphics is a fair price for working mass PvP, what is annoying is all the fanbois who are trying to convince people that the graphics are "amazing" or "better than wow."

    
     

    Indeed. Mythic seems to have put all energy in the gameplay. So be it. Game's fun in the beginning (playin the 5-Bucks-EU-Preoder to have a look).

    But the whole presentation - gfx, artwork, animations, soundeffects, music, lore - is outdated and mediocre at best. Besides Mass-PVP and PQs there is nothing special that makes a difference between WAR and those who were smart enough to copy WAR's (Tabletop) look years before.

    Clunky elves, dwarves & orcs.  A polished game for average-joe-fantasy-lover.  But not thaaat special.

     

    I agree, but if I do play any mmo coming out, ot'll be for the story, and the gameplay, graphics arent as important- so long as they are up to standards with the rest of the gen, hell i mean even gw is fine. Im more about what makes it different, pvp, and gameplay.

  • Posted: 9/18/08 4:27 AM
    WAR (Warhammer Online)
• • Account created with preorder CE,wanna continue with SE.....

  • All those people that are wrongly pre-ordering WAR that wouldnt buy it afterwards, would all just to WARs deffence as fanbois if I said it was shit, but are haappy with not purchasing the coppies they preordered.

  • Posted: 9/16/08 3:43 PM
    WAR (Warhammer Online)
• • Sandboxes don't need PvP, at all !!

  • Originally posted by Meridion
    

    Just wanted to state that sandbox style gameplay does not need free-looting, it does not need free PvP, it does not even need PvP at all.

    Sandboxes can work without actually ever engaging in any form of combat. The problem is that most of the sandbox-fanatics are also hardcore competetive players, people that WANT to be able to kill, burn down, plunder and loot everything.

    But looking at the concepts themselves, PvP is NOT necessary for a free sandbox game! Just wanted to let you know ^^

    Meridion

     

    Thats ur opinion, but I enjoy PvP, and I want pvp. If I am going to pay for a game, they better have some awesome pvp, or something in itd sted.

  • Posted: 9/16/08 3:37 PM
    General Discussion
• • Stargate Worlds On Steam

  • Originally posted by zorky
    

    we have about 69 members now so dont be shy come on and join the fun of playing steam games together :)

     

    First of all, lol 69 , and second of all, I will join.

  • Posted: 9/15/08 3:12 AM
    Stargate Worlds
• • Is it worth the subscription?

  • Honestly i dont think its worth it, imo. I mean if you enjoy it go ahead, but if you dont then dont pay. simple, just look at how you play, ask youself is this worth my time, then decide. I didnt mind PotBS.

  • Posted: 9/15/08 3:03 AM
    Pirates of the Caribbean Online