| Username | waverat81 |
| Real Name | |
| Rank | Apprentice Member |
| Joined | June 7, 2005 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | 26 |
| Location | Honolulu, HI, United States |
| Last Visit | May 16, 2008 |
| Post Count | 287 |
| Biography | |
| Quote |
Originally posted by starbeadComparing AoC to Vanguard as far as tech is concerned is purely opinion. Yes I agree that a few people problems running the game, but to make the comparison and for it to hold water, you'd have to wait till after the 20th.
Originally posted by waverat81No troll.
Originally posted by starbeadWhat the hell are you talking about?
The fanbois have pwned the OP. Long live Age of Vanguard!
I dare you to name one game where the starting area is different for everyone every time.
Dammit I fell for the troll.
I sincerely believe that the OP has been pwned by the Conan fanbois. If you mean my use of fanboi, I must ask "Who else would be defending such a buggy, unstable, technological nightmare?"
The OP has been effectively dismissed, but that does NOT change the fundamental fact that from a tech standpoint, AoC is the new Vanguard.
Originally posted by TheSheikhConsidering at launch you could start out an any of the npc cities on any of the base planets you do have a point, however missions were either animal/npc lairs/bases or delivery.
Pre-CU SWG perhaps?
Even than the only difference was were you started out, there were no unique type quests to each city. SWG never had a decent "questing" system. However, nothing beats player made content, something SWG "had".
Originally posted by starbeadWhat the hell are you talking about?
The fanbois have pwned the OP. Long live Age of Vanguard!
I dare you to name one game where the starting area is different for everyone every time.
Dammit I fell for the troll.
Originally posted by Talin
Originally posted by Swiftleaf
1) You will always begin your leveling from 1 to 20 at same place.
2) There is actually ONE race to play in this game.
---> Human Race <----
Nothing else...
I can't see much difference of playing American or English or Egyptian... Really, come on...
You sir, are a tool and a troll. How droll.
Levels 1-20 are supposed to be the same, as they are the "storyline" levels. This isn't WoW, remember?
Aye, you are very true this isn't WoW where the game is the same from 1-70 EVERYTIME!!!
Poor attempt at trolling OP.
Originally posted by Sharkypal
Originally posted by waverat81
For those of you saying without a doubt AoC won't achieve such and such numbers, when WoW released did you think it would have 10 million subscriptions worldwide ever? I seriously doubt it.
Also for those that claim AoC will only have a niche market because of the IP, I supposed none of you had ever heard of the Warcraft franchise before Wow /sarcasm off
I'd say given the fact that WoW has pulled so many people into the genre, anything is possible as far as subscription numbers go.
Will AoC run on pretty much ANY system?
Yes, just maybe not at high settings.
Is AoC friendly to children or parents who play MMOs with their children as a family unit?
I know what your getting at, but let me ask you a question to answer this. How many copies of GTA4 have already been sold? Rating means nothing nowadays.
In case you are in ANY doubt, the answer to both these questions is a resounding NO and those are two of the biggest reasons that WoW is such a huge success subscriber wise.
They are only a resounding NO in your eyes, because you don't want to see anything else.
S
I never said, AoC would kill WoW or surpass it's numbers. I simply commented on some of the arguments that people are using to claim AoC will have poor numbers or lower than expected.
What is your favourite race to play in Lord of the Rings Online?